- Task Chart
- States
- Copies
Feel Timeline
Seemingly the shape issues try resolved as well as the execution was below comment. If the RFC getting arranged to own talk from the TechCom?
It seems that the form questions are fixed as well as the implementation is significantly less than opinion. Should the RFC getting scheduled to have talk from the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- New proposal from the activity breakdown is quite not the same as http://www.besthookupwebsites.net/nl/dating-apps/ what has been then followed. Because of it to progress due to the fact a keen RFC, work malfunction must be updated so you can mirror what we are actually thinking about.
- We don’t know if this is certainly advised strictly while the a third cluster function, or deployment towards the WMF expertise. If it’s for 3rd activities, may possibly not even need an RFC, and could maybe be achieved given that an expansion also. When it is having WMF manufacturing, we will have to seem very closely into implications to have caching and you may efficiency.
Seemingly the design issues is resolved in addition to implementation is actually lower than comment. Should the RFC feel scheduled to have talk at TechCom?
18+ discuter
- This new suggestion on the activity description is fairly distinctive from what could have been used. For this to succeed as a keen RFC, the job dysfunction should be upgraded to help you echo that which we seem to be deciding on.
- We don’t determine if it is recommended purely because a 3rd cluster ability, or implementation to the WMF systems. If it is just for 3rd activities, it may not actually you want a keen RFC, and could possibly be performed because the an expansion as well. If it’s for WMF production, we will have to seem very closely on effects for caching and you will show.
W.r.t. #1 – The shape enjoys indeed advanced as we works with towards section point alot more usable and user-friendly. We could change the fresh breakdown associated with the RFC. #2 – Really does “deployment into WMF systems” indicate to make that it section of MediaWiki core app? In my opinion it has got always been the latest expectation, this is the reason this has gone through of several iterations out of construction, i18n and you will perf improvement 🙂 You certainly will WMF household members chime into establish this really is nevertheless the new circumstances?
#dos – Really does “deployment on the WMF assistance” indicate making which section of MediaWiki key software? I believe it has got for ages been brand new expectation, this is why it has got experienced of many iterations from design, i18n and you can perf improvement 🙂 You may WMF family chime directly into show it is nevertheless this new situation?
It means permitting it on the about a few of the WMF internet. Whether it is element of center otherwise an extension is not thus related. The first RFC has been submitted to the concept of with that it let toward Wikipedia and you will family, but I would ike to keeps specific word thereon from the related WMF individuals.
18+ discuter
- Do not know if this is exactly suggested strictly as the a 3rd party element, or even for deployment on WMF systems. In case it is for just third parties, may possibly not even you would like a keen RFC, and will possibly performed given that an extension too. In case it is to have WMF design, we will have to appear very closely toward ramifications having caching and you can efficiency.
Offering a technological direction: the present day utilization of this particular aspect depends on certain transform so you’re able to the Parser yields and also the Facial skin layout, and that need change into key. To accomplish an equivalent from inside the an extension, here still needs to be specific improvement in the newest center – especially to provide the point beliefs to your SkinEditSectionLinks hook up (and therefore most of the alter but the genuine adding of your ‘share’ link would have to go into the key anyway). I do believe for that reason it makes far more sense for it once the a core alter. It is still configurable due to $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare all over the world, which is off automatically. In the event that value was false, no extra reasoning otherwise JavaScript/CSS resources try invoked of the ability.
